<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clean Energy Digest &#187; sequestration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanenergydigest.com/tag/sequestration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanenergydigest.com</link>
	<description>Clean Energy News, Analysis and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>FutureGen In Jeopardy</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanenergydigest.com/2008/01/30/futuregen-in-jeopardy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanenergydigest.com/2008/01/30/futuregen-in-jeopardy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Safuto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futuregen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanenergydigest.com/2008/01/30/futuregen-in-jeopardy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In recent weeks there have been some questions about how (or even if) the FutureGen project would go forward. Those questions may have been answered today.
This morning the Washington post reported, &#8220;&#8230;the Bush administration might drop its support for a $1.5 billion coal-fired power plant designed to store greenhouse gases underground, citing mounting cost estimates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent weeks there have been some questions about how (or even if) the <a href="http://www.futuregenalliance.org/" target="_blank">FutureGen</a> project would go forward. Those questions may have been answered today.</p>
<p>This morning the Washington post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/29/AR2008012903287.html" target="_blank">reported</a>, &#8220;&#8230;the Bush administration might drop its support for a $1.5 billion coal-fired power plant designed to store greenhouse gases underground, citing mounting cost estimates and other possible technologies.&#8221; Later in the day Platts <a href="http://www.platts.com/Electric%20Power/News/6743335.xml" target="_blank">reported</a>, &#8220;The US Department of Energy will likely divide some of its funding for the scrapped FutureGen power plant between a handful of carbon capture and storage projects&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>FutureGen CEO Michael Mudd responded <a href="http://www.futuregenalliance.org/news/releases/pr_01-30-08.stm" target="_blank">via a press release</a> by stating, &#8220;The Alliance remains committed to keeping FutureGen on track. We owe it to the people of Illinois, to the Alliance members who have contributed significant funds and resources to bring the project to this stage and to society which depends on technology to provide clean, affordable and secure energy.&#8221;</p>
<p>The reports of the redistribution of funds by the DOE seem to be accurate. In recent days there have been announcements of a variety of new clean energy projects including <a href="http://www.eere.energy.gov/news/news_detail.cfm/news_id=11547" target="_blank">a partnership</a> with the state of Hawaii, <a href="http://www.eere.energy.gov/news/news_detail.cfm/news_id=11549" target="_blank">investment in cellulosic bio-refineries</a> and <a href="http://www.eere.energy.gov/news/news_detail.cfm/news_id=11535" target="_blank">funding for hybrid plug-in development</a> in Michigan.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll keep an eye on the DOE to see if any funds specifically slated for carbon capture and storage are announced in the near future.</p>
 <p><center>&copy; Clean Energy Digest - visit <a href="http://www.cleanenergydigest.com">Clean Energy Digest</a> for more great content.</center></p>                        ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanenergydigest.com/2008/01/30/futuregen-in-jeopardy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FutureGen CEO On Delay</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanenergydigest.com/2008/01/24/futuregen-ceo-on-delay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanenergydigest.com/2008/01/24/futuregen-ceo-on-delay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Safuto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futuregen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanenergydigest.com/2008/01/24/futuregen-ceo-on-delay/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FutureGen is a $1.2 billion (and rising) project funded by both the private sector and U.S. Federal Government. The goal is to build a zero-emissions coal power plant that uses carbon capture and sequestration technology. In December the FutureGen Alliance announced the selection of Matoon, Illinois as the site for the project. Unfortunately the Department [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.futuregenalliance.org/">FutureGen</a> is a $1.2 billion (and rising) project funded by both the private sector and U.S. Federal Government. The goal is to build a zero-emissions coal power plant that uses carbon capture and sequestration technology. In December the FutureGen Alliance announced the selection of Matoon, Illinois as the site for the project. Unfortunately the Department of Energy has put their final approval of the selected site on hold due to budget concerns. </p>
<p>In this video (click &#8216;read the rest&#8217; to view) courtesy of <a href="http://www.eenews.net/tv/2008/01/17">E&#038;E TV</a> Future Gen Alliance CEO Michael Mudd explains the current situation.</p>
<p><span id="more-96"></span><br />
<iframe src ="http://www.eenews.net/flash/video_player.swf?edition=4487&#038;starter=1&#038;pub_id=5&#038;page_id=4487&#038;page_type=edition_page&#038;presentation_type=edition_display" width="443px" height="312px" ><br />
</iframe></p>
 <p><center>&copy; Clean Energy Digest - visit <a href="http://www.cleanenergydigest.com">Clean Energy Digest</a> for more great content.</center></p>                        ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanenergydigest.com/2008/01/24/futuregen-ceo-on-delay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
